M/S. VEDANT INFRACON THR ITS PARTNER MR RAHUL PREMPRAKASH GOEL vs MR. GANESH BALASHEB SHENDKAR AND ORS. — CRA/268/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 115. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010188102026

Filing Number

CRA/10952/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRA/268/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATIONS ( 67 )

Sub-Category

Against Order of Civil Court (Except under Rent Act) ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. VEDANT INFRACON THR ITS PARTNER MR RAHUL PREMPRAKASH GOEL

    Adv. Sancheti Nitesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MR. GANESH BALASHEB SHENDKAR AND ORS.

  2. 2.MR. DHASRAT PANDURANG MALVATKAR

  3. 3.MR. RAMESH PANDURANG MALVATKAR

  4. 4.MR. SANTOSH PANDURANG MALVATKAR

  5. 5.MR. TANAJI LAXMAN MASAL

  6. 6.MR. SAMBHAJI LAXMAN MASAL

  7. 7.SOU. ALKA RAMCHANDRA DAGDE

  8. 8.SMT. SULOCHANA MAHADEO LONKAR

  9. 9.MRS. AHILYA SUDAM KALE

  10. 10.MRS. NIRMALA TANAJI MASAL

  11. 11.MR. TEJAS TANAJI MASAL

  12. 12.MR. DHANANJAY TANAJI MASAL

  13. 13.MISS. PRIYANKA TANAJI MASAL

  14. 14.MRS. VANDANA SAMBHAJI MASAL

  15. 15.MR. MAYUR SAMBHAJI MASAL

  16. 16.MR. AKSHAY SAMBHAJI MASAL

  17. 17.MR. NAMDEV BHAGUJI MASAL

  18. 18.MR. RAMCHANDRA BHAGUJI MASAL

  19. 19.MR. MAHADEV SADU BHOSALE

  20. 20.SMT. PUSHPA ASHOK MASAL

  21. 21.MR. TUSHAR ASHOK MASAL

  22. 22.MR. RANJEET ASHOK MASAL

  23. 23.MRS. SHELEJA MAHENDRA OSWAL

  24. 24.MRS. VIDHI LALCHAND OSWAL

  25. 25.MR. MOHIT GUL DASWANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA/268/2026 The High Court of Bombay dismissed Vedant Infracon's (Defendant No. 22) civil revision application challenging the lower court's rejection of its plaint rejection application. The court held that plaintiffs' suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural land is not ex-facie barred by limitation, as the original tenant Bhaguji Masal became the statutory deemed purchaser on Tiller's day under the Maharashtra Tenancy Act, 1948, vesting title defeasibly in him. Since the erstwhile landlord was divested of all rights in 1957, subsequent registered sale deeds (1995 onwards) could not validly convey superior title, and limitation is a mixed question of law and fact inappropriate for threshold dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/268/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA/268/2026 The High Court of Bombay dismissed Vedant Infracon's (Defendant No. 22) civil revision application challenging the lower court's rejection of its plaint rejection application. The court held that plaintiffs' suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural land is not ex-facie barred by limitation, as the original tenant Bhaguji Masal became the statutory deemed purchaser on Tiller's day under the Maharashtra Tenancy Act, 1948, vesting title defeasibly in him. Since the erstwhile landlord was divested of all rights in 1957, subsequent registered sale deeds (1995 onwards) could not validly convey superior title, and limitation is a mixed question of law and fact inappropriate for threshold dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case