TANZIF NISAR KUNGALE vs STATE OF MAHRASHTRA THR MAHARASHTRA REGIONAL PLANNING — WP/5071/2026

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section NA. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010187832026

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/10935/2026

Filing Date

15-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5071/2026

Registration Date

16-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

Coram

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

TANZIF NISAR KUNGALE

Adv. VISHAL PATIL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHRASHTRA THR MAHARASHTRA REGIONAL PLANNING

LD. DISTRICT COLLECTOR THANE

TAHASILDAR AND EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE KALYAN

TALATHI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

17-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

18-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned Writ Petition No. 5071/2026 filed by Tanzif Nisar Kungale against the State of Maharashtra and others, posting it to 18th June 2026 for filing the respondents' reply affidavit. The court granted an ad-interim stay on the operation of orders dated 10th March 2026 and 6th April 2026 until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned Writ Petition No. 5071/2026 filed by Tanzif Nisar Kungale against the State of Maharashtra and others, posting it to 18th June 2026 for filing the respondents' reply affidavit. The court granted an ad-interim stay on the operation of orders dated 10th March 2026 and 6th April 2026 until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case