GARLICK ENGINEERING ( AN ERSTWHILE CLOSED DIV. OF M/S. EMPIRE INDUSTRIES LTD. ) AND ORS vs SURESH H. KARALE AND ORS — IA/3054/2026

Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010186732026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

IA/10857/2026

Filing Date

15-04-2026

Registration No

IA/3054/2026

Registration Date

18-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947

Petitioner(s)

GARLICK ENGINEERING ( AN ERSTWHILE CLOSED DIV. OF M/S. EMPIRE INDUSTRIES LTD. ) AND ORS

Adv. sujeet premanand salkar

Respondent(s)

SURESH H. KARALE AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

23-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Case Summary: IA/3054/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Garlick Engineering's interim applications seeking withdrawal of Rs. 25 lakhs deposited pursuant to an April 22, 2019 order and return of furnished bank guarantees. Judge Amit Borkar found that applicants made out a sufficient case for relief, granting prayer clause "a" and also allowing prayer clause "b" concerning a typographical error, despite respondent's assertion of intent to challenge the underlying order before the Supreme Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/3054/2026 The Bombay High Court allowed Garlick Engineering's interim applications seeking withdrawal of Rs. 25 lakhs deposited pursuant to an April 22, 2019 order and return of furnished bank guarantees. Judge Amit Borkar found that applicants made out a sufficient case for relief, granting prayer clause "a" and also allowing prayer clause "b" concerning a typographical error, despite respondent's assertion of intent to challenge the underlying order before the Supreme Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case