ATMARAM GOVIND PARAB AND ORS vs ANANT ATMARAM DALVI AND ORS — WP/6032/2026

Case under B.t. & A.l. Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010186692026

Filing Number

WP/10854/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6032/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

B.t. & A.l. Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATMARAM GOVIND PARAB AND ORS

    Adv. P G SABNIS

  2. 2.SARITA TUKARAM PARAD

  3. 3.PANDURANG SHANKAR PARAB

  4. 4.VISHWAS LAXMAN PARAB

  5. 5.MANGESH VASANT PARAB

  6. 6.CHANDRAKANT APA PARAB DECEASED BY HEIR, PRASHANT CHANDRAKANT PARAB

  7. 7.ANANT APA PARAB

  8. 8.NAMDEV APA PARAB DECEASED BY HEIR, PRAKASH NAMDEV PAAB

  9. 9.NAMDEV JAGANNATH PARAB

  10. 10.JANARDAN JAGANNATH PARAB

  11. 11.SHARAD DHARMARAJ PARAB

  12. 12.RAMESH GOVIND PARAB

  13. 13.NARAYAN SHANKAR PARAB DECEASED BY HEIR, RAJESH NARAYAN PARAB

  14. 14.SHASHIKANT SHANKAR PARAB

  15. 15.SANJAY SHANKAR PARAB

  16. 16.RAMKRISHNA GOVIND PARAB

  17. 17.SANTOSH GOVIND PARAB

  18. 18.SANJAY TUKARAM PARAB

  19. 19.SATISH TUKARAM PARAB

  20. 20.MANALI MAHESH KADAM

  21. 21.ROHINI CHANDRAKANT SAWANT

  22. 22.JAYAWANTI PRAKASH NAIK

  23. 23.VATSALA ATMARAM JADHAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANANT ATMARAM DALVI AND ORS

  2. 2.MANGESH EKNATH NADKARNI

  3. 3.MANOHAR JAGANNTHA NANCHE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 6032/2026 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's decision that reversed the Sub-Divisional Officer's condonation of a 51-year delay in challenging an Agricultural Lands Tribunal order regarding agricultural land ownership. Key Reasoning: The court held that the SDO erred by condoning the inordinate 51-year delay based on merits rather than examining the sufficiency of the petitioners' explanation. Courts must first scrutinize the bona fides of delay explanations before considering case merits. The court emphasized that delay cannot be condoned as an act of generosity, citing Supreme Court precedent that limitation rules serve important public policy and cannot be frustrate by appeals to "substantial justice." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6032/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 6032/2026 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's decision that reversed the Sub-Divisional Officer's condonation of a 51-year delay in challenging an Agricultural Lands Tribunal order regarding agricultural land ownership. Key Reasoning: The court held that the SDO erred by condoning the inordinate 51-year delay based on merits rather than examining the sufficiency of the petitioners' explanation. Courts must first scrutinize the bona fides of delay explanations before considering case merits. The court emphasized that delay cannot be condoned as an act of generosity, citing Supreme Court precedent that limitation rules serve important public policy and cannot be frustrate by appeals to "substantial justice." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case