ATMARAM GOVIND PARAB AND ORS vs ANANT ATMARAM DALVI AND ORS — WP/6032/2026

Case under B.t. & A.l. Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010186692026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/10854/2026

Filing Date

15-04-2026

Registration No

WP/6032/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

B.t. & A.l. Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

ATMARAM GOVIND PARAB AND ORS

Adv. P G SABNIS

SARITA TUKARAM PARAD

PANDURANG SHANKAR PARAB

VISHWAS LAXMAN PARAB

MANGESH VASANT PARAB

CHANDRAKANT APA PARAB DECEASED BY HEIR, PRASHANT CHANDRAKANT PARAB

ANANT APA PARAB

NAMDEV APA PARAB DECEASED BY HEIR, PRAKASH NAMDEV PAAB

NAMDEV JAGANNATH PARAB

JANARDAN JAGANNATH PARAB

SHARAD DHARMARAJ PARAB

RAMESH GOVIND PARAB

NARAYAN SHANKAR PARAB DECEASED BY HEIR, RAJESH NARAYAN PARAB

SHASHIKANT SHANKAR PARAB

SANJAY SHANKAR PARAB

RAMKRISHNA GOVIND PARAB

SANTOSH GOVIND PARAB

SANJAY TUKARAM PARAB

SATISH TUKARAM PARAB

MANALI MAHESH KADAM

ROHINI CHANDRAKANT SAWANT

JAYAWANTI PRAKASH NAIK

VATSALA ATMARAM JADHAV

Respondent(s)

ANANT ATMARAM DALVI AND ORS

MANGESH EKNATH NADKARNI

MANOHAR JAGANNTHA NANCHE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

04-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Case Summary: WP 6032/2026 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's decision that reversed the Sub-Divisional Officer's condonation of a 51-year delay in challenging an Agricultural Lands Tribunal order regarding agricultural land ownership. Key Reasoning: The court held that the SDO erred by condoning the inordinate 51-year delay based on merits rather than examining the sufficiency of the petitioners' explanation. Courts must first scrutinize the bona fides of delay explanations before considering case merits. The court emphasized that delay cannot be condoned as an act of generosity, citing Supreme Court precedent that limitation rules serve important public policy and cannot be frustrate by appeals to "substantial justice." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 6032/2026 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's decision that reversed the Sub-Divisional Officer's condonation of a 51-year delay in challenging an Agricultural Lands Tribunal order regarding agricultural land ownership. Key Reasoning: The court held that the SDO erred by condoning the inordinate 51-year delay based on merits rather than examining the sufficiency of the petitioners' explanation. Courts must first scrutinize the bona fides of delay explanations before considering case merits. The court emphasized that delay cannot be condoned as an act of generosity, citing Supreme Court precedent that limitation rules serve important public policy and cannot be frustrate by appeals to "substantial justice." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case