GARLICK ENGINEERING ( AN ERSTWHILE CLOSED DIV. OF M/S. EMPIRE INDUSTRIES LTD. ) AND ORS vs SURESH KRISHNA PATIL AND ORS — IA/3058/2026

Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010186682026

Filing Number

IA/10853/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/3058/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GARLICK ENGINEERING ( AN ERSTWHILE CLOSED DIV. OF M/S. EMPIRE INDUSTRIES LTD. ) AND ORS

    Adv. sujeet premanand salkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESH KRISHNA PATIL AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed Garlick Engineering's interim applications seeking withdrawal of Rs. 25 lakhs deposited and return of bank guarantees furnished pursuant to an April 22, 2019 order. Justice Amit Borkar found the applicants made out a case for relief under prayer clause "a" and also allowed prayer clause "b" concerning a typographical error, despite the respondent's contention that they intended to challenge the order before the Supreme Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3058/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed Garlick Engineering's interim applications seeking withdrawal of Rs. 25 lakhs deposited and return of bank guarantees furnished pursuant to an April 22, 2019 order. Justice Amit Borkar found the applicants made out a case for relief under prayer clause "a" and also allowed prayer clause "b" concerning a typographical error, despite the respondent's contention that they intended to challenge the order before the Supreme Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case