HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SHRI PRAKASH NAIK, COURT SERVICE NOTICE ISSUED ON 27/04/2023 vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — APEAL/521/2009
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010186682009
Filing Number
APEAL/557/2009
Filing Date
22-May-2009
Registration No
APEAL/521/2009
Registration Date
22-May-2009
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST ORDER OF ACQUITTAL ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. SHRI PRAKASH NAIK, COURT SERVICE NOTICE ISSUED ON 27/04/2023
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
-
2.GOODVALUE MARKETING CO. LTD.
-
3.DILIP S. DAHANUKAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.'s criminal appeal against an acquittal order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for want of prosecution. The appellant failed to appear on multiple scheduled dates despite being properly served notice, resulting in the Court dismissing the appeal due to repeated absence and lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
08-Dec-2009
Notification
Hon'ble Smt. Justice R.S. Dalvi
-
13-Nov-2009
Notification
Hon'ble Smt. Justice R.S. Dalvi
-
22-May-2009
Case filed
Registration No. APEAL/521/2009
-
04-Mar-2009
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
The Bombay High Court dismissed Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.'s criminal appeal against an acquittal order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for want of prosecution. The appellant failed to appear on multiple scheduled dates despite being properly served notice, resulting in the Court dismissing the appeal due to repeated absence and lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts