RAJKUMAR DATTATRYA SHEDGE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND ORS — IA/12523/2025

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section 227. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010186522025

Filing Number

IA/12034/2025

Filing Date

29-Mar-2025

Registration No

IA/12523/2025

Registration Date

14-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Cooperative Socities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJKUMAR DATTATRYA SHEDGE

    Adv. Dipak Shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed Rajkumar Dattatraya Shedge's writ petition challenging a July 2022 District Magistrate order under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961, holding that such powers are executionary in nature with no discretion involved. The court relied on precedent establishing that writ petitions cannot be entertained against such ministerial orders, disposing of both the petition and interim application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  4. 09-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  5. 09-Dec-2025

    Due Admission -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  6. 13-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 29-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/12523/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Rajkumar Dattatraya Shedge's writ petition challenging a July 2022 District Magistrate order under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961, holding that such powers are executionary in nature with no discretion involved. The court relied on precedent establishing that writ petitions cannot be entertained against such ministerial orders, disposing of both the petition and interim application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case