LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH REVENUE DEPT AND ANR Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, R.NO. 1 AND 2 — WP/5883/2014
Case under Defence of India Act. Disposed: --Rule Made Absolute on 20th October 2015.
CNR: HCBM010186392014
Filing Number
WP/12534/2014
Filing Date
02-May-2014
Registration No
WP/5883/2014
Registration Date
25-Jun-2014
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
20-Oct-2015
Nature of Disposal
--Rule Made Absolute
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA
Adv. THE LAW POINT
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH REVENUE DEPT AND ANR Advocate - GP WRIT CELL, R.NO. 1 AND 2
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. S.B. Panse, a retired District Judge, as the sole arbitrator to resolve Arbitration Case No. 3 of 1969 between Life Insurance Corporation of India and the State of Maharashtra, with the consent of both parties. The court accepted the petitioner's request to limit the arbitration to Case No. 3 only (rather than Cases 2 and 3 as originally directed) in the interest of justice, and the arbitrator was directed to proceed in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
20-Oct-2015
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
20-Oct-2015
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
20-Oct-2015
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
12-Oct-2015
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
30-Jul-2015
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
30-Jul-2015
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
15-Jul-2015
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
15-Jul-2015
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
07-Apr-2015
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka,hon'ble Shri Justice A.P. BhangaleView PDF
-
07-Apr-2015
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.P. Bhangale
-
04-Mar-2015
Hon'ble Shri Justice A. K. Menon,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
04-Mar-2015
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice A. K. Menon , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
20-Jan-2015
Hon'ble Shri Justice A. K. Menon,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
20-Jan-2015
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice A. K. Menon , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
09-Dec-2014
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
09-Dec-2014
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
31-Oct-2014
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
31-Oct-2014
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
04-Sep-2014
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
04-Sep-2014
For Admission - Fresh
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
24-Jul-2014
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
24-Jul-2014
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-May-2014
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5883/2014
The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. S.B. Panse, a retired District Judge, as the sole arbitrator to resolve Arbitration Case No. 3 of 1969 between Life Insurance Corporation of India and the State of Maharashtra, with the consent of both parties. The court accepted the petitioner's request to limit the arbitration to Case No. 3 only (rather than Cases 2 and 3 as originally directed) in the interest of justice, and the arbitrator was directed to proceed in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts