NILESH SUBHASH MUNDADA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/5380/2026
Case under Indian Forest Act Section NA. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010186322026
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/10829/2026
Filing Date
15-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5380/2026
Registration Date
18-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Bench Type
Division
Category
FORESTS ( 27 )
Sub-Category
PRIVATE FOREST ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NILESH SUBHASH MUNDADA
Adv. Kashvi Ail
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ORS
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PUNE
DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST , PUNE DIVISION, PUNE
SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER MAVAL
TEHSILDAR , MAVAL
CIRCLE OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 29-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary - WP 5380/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition filed by Nilesh Subhash Mundada against the State of Maharashtra and forest officials. The court directed respondents to file their affidavit-in-reply within six weeks, with liberty for the petitioner to file a rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. The case was adjourned and re-notified for June 29, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - WP 5380/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition filed by Nilesh Subhash Mundada against the State of Maharashtra and forest officials. The court directed respondents to file their affidavit-in-reply within six weeks, with liberty for the petitioner to file a rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. The case was adjourned and re-notified for June 29, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts