BRIJESH KUMAR SIDHNATH MISHRA AND ORS LAW JURIS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — WP/2094/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 21,226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010186262026
Filing Number
WP/7804/2026
Filing Date
15-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/2094/2026
Registration Date
20-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRIJESH KUMAR SIDHNATH MISHRA AND ORS LAW JURIS
-
2.PRASHANT BIJESH MISHRA
-
3.RANI BIRJESH MISHRA
-
4.MAHIMA PRASHANT MISHRA
-
5.GANESHDUTT RAJDEV MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
-
2.SURESH KUMAR KANHAIYALAL YADAV
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
This is a common order issued by the Bombay High Court on 12th June 2026 regarding multiple matters that could not be heard due to lack of time. The court directed removal of office objections within one week, ordered filing of affidavits-in-reply within one week, and scheduled the matters for hearing across multiple dates (15-19 June and 6-8 July 2026), with matters dismissed if petitioners fail to supply spare copies for notice service within 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
27-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2094/2026
This is a common order issued by the Bombay High Court on 12th June 2026 regarding multiple matters that could not be heard due to lack of time. The court directed removal of office objections within one week, ordered filing of affidavits-in-reply within one week, and scheduled the matters for hearing across multiple dates (15-19 June and 6-8 July 2026), with matters dismissed if petitioners fail to supply spare copies for notice service within 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts