NITIN POPATRAO BACHHAV vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/983/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010184792026

Filing Number

ABA/7751/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

ABA/983/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),316(5),318(4),336(2),336(3),338,340(2),61(2),3(5)
Information Technology Act Section 66,66(C),66(D)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN POPATRAO BACHHAV

    Adv. PRAVIN UTTAM GAIKWAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF

    Case Summary: ABA/983/2026 The Bombay High Court directed the Sessions Court, Nashik to expeditiously decide Nitin Popatrao Bachhav's pending Anticipatory Bail Application (No. 140 of 2026) within one week, as it had remained pending since 17 March 2026 without interim protection or final decision. The High Court disposed of the present anticipatory bail application by issuing this mandamus-type direction, requiring the Sessions Judge to decide the matter on its merits in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/983/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/983/2026 The Bombay High Court directed the Sessions Court, Nashik to expeditiously decide Nitin Popatrao Bachhav's pending Anticipatory Bail Application (No. 140 of 2026) within one week, as it had remained pending since 17 March 2026 without interim protection or final decision. The High Court disposed of the present anticipatory bail application by issuing this mandamus-type direction, requiring the Sessions Judge to decide the matter on its merits in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case