RAJESH HARISHCHANDRA KUDALKAR vs NANDKISHOR HARISHCHANDRA KUDALKAR AND ORS. Advocate - VIKRAM N WALAWALKAR, ( CAVEAT AND V.P. FILED ) — IA/3950/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010184642026
Filing Number
IA/10724/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
IA/3950/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Against Order of Civil Court - Single Bench ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH HARISHCHANDRA KUDALKAR
Adv. S S Dube
Respondent(s)
-
1.NANDKISHOR HARISHCHANDRA KUDALKAR AND ORS. Advocate - VIKRAM N WALAWALKAR, ( CAVEAT AND V.P. FILED )
-
2.VIJAY HARISHCHANDRA KUDALKAR- DECEASED THR LEGAL HEIRS(Legal Heir)2.
-
3.CHANDRASHEKHAR VIJAYKUMAR KUDALKAR2.
-
4.SWATI SANJAY MUNGEKAR @ NEETA VIJAY KUDALKAR2.
-
5.JYOTI PRATAP KUDALKAR2.
-
6.MRS. GEETA VISHAL JADHAV
-
7.VIDYA SAKHARAM SAWAL
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
Case Summary: IA 3950/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on July 14, 2026, in an interim application filed by appellant Rajesh Harishchandra Kudalkar against Nandkishor Harishchandra Kudalkar and others. The case was adjourned to July 14, 2026, with respondent No. 1 permitted to engage alternate counsel in place of the caveat-filing advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters Auto Listed
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/3950/2026
Case Summary: IA 3950/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents returnable on July 14, 2026, in an interim application filed by appellant Rajesh Harishchandra Kudalkar against Nandkishor Harishchandra Kudalkar and others. The case was adjourned to July 14, 2026, with respondent No. 1 permitted to engage alternate counsel in place of the caveat-filing advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts