DIPAK SUNIL VEER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1734/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010184612026
Filing Number
BA/7739/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
BA/1734/2026
Registration Date
15-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIPAK SUNIL VEER
Adv. Akshay Bankapur
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
Summary of BA/1734/2026: The High Court of Bombay granted regular bail to Dipak Sunil Veer in a conspiracy case involving an alleged shooting attack on September 17, 2025. The court found insufficient evidence directly linking the applicant to the crime—the eyewitness did not mention him by name, and the meeting with the co-accused occurred seven days before the incident. Considering he had been incarcerated for over four months and trial conclusion would take further time, bail was granted on Rs. 30,000 P.R. Bond with conditions including monthly police station reporting and prohibition on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
21-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
21-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/1734/2026
Summary of BA/1734/2026: The High Court of Bombay granted regular bail to Dipak Sunil Veer in a conspiracy case involving an alleged shooting attack on September 17, 2025. The court found insufficient evidence directly linking the applicant to the crime—the eyewitness did not mention him by name, and the meeting with the co-accused occurred seven days before the incident. Considering he had been incarcerated for over four months and trial conclusion would take further time, bail was granted on Rs. 30,000 P.R. Bond with conditions including monthly police station reporting and prohibition on witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts