VINOD SHANTARAM BODHARE PATIL VINOD PRAKASH vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — WP/4775/2026
Case under Right of Persons with Disabilities Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010183342026
Filing Number
XFER/10648/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
WP/4775/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VINOD SHANTARAM BODHARE PATIL VINOD PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NASHIK DIVISION, NASHIK
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, JALGAON
THE DY. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (GAD) ZILLAPARISHAD, JALGAON
THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PANCHAYAT SAMITI, CHOPDA,
THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PANCHAYAT SAMITI, YAWAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 07-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
WP 4775/2026 (Vinod Shantaram Bodhare Patil v. State of Maharashtra) was disposed by the Bombay High Court on May 7, 2026, by granting interim relief identical to that granted in the lead case WP 4325/2026 (Santosh Hiraman Lashkare). The court applied the reasoning and directions from the earlier judgment to all identically-placed petitioners in this batch of consolidated writ petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
WP 4775/2026 (Vinod Shantaram Bodhare Patil v. State of Maharashtra) was disposed by the Bombay High Court on May 7, 2026, by granting interim relief identical to that granted in the lead case WP 4325/2026 (Santosh Hiraman Lashkare). The court applied the reasoning and directions from the earlier judgment to all identically-placed petitioners in this batch of consolidated writ petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts