M/S. V. V. ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS vs SHREE MANDAR CO-OP.HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED — AO/392/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010183282026

Filing Number

AO/10642/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

AO/392/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. V. V. ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS

    Adv. Suyash Sule

  2. 2.JAYESH DUNGARSHI GALA

  3. 3.VIHANG JAYESH GALA

  4. 4.VIKRAM HEMCHAND VISARIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHREE MANDAR CO-OP.HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay disposed of the Appeal from Order without deciding merits, instead directing the District Judge, Kalyan to dispose of the underlying Regular Civil Appeal No.25 of 2025 within six months while keeping all parties' contentions expressly open. The court found no purpose in keeping the interlocutory appeal pending and granted the appellants' request for a time-bound resolution without prejudicing either party's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/392/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay disposed of the Appeal from Order without deciding merits, instead directing the District Judge, Kalyan to dispose of the underlying Regular Civil Appeal No.25 of 2025 within six months while keeping all parties' contentions expressly open. The court found no purpose in keeping the interlocutory appeal pending and granted the appellants' request for a time-bound resolution without prejudicing either party's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case