ASHA ASHOK KATARIYA vs THE REVENUE COMMISSIONER AND ORS — WP/6184/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section NA. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Next hearing 30-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010182432026

Filing Number

WP/10594/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/6184/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHA ASHOK KATARIYA

    Adv. Pramod Narayan Joshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE REVENUE COMMISSIONER AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR

  3. 3.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ASSISTANT

  4. 4.THE COMMISSIONER

  5. 5.THE DY. CHIEF ENGINEER (NIRMAN)

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Jun-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted permission to the petitioner to replace an incorrectly annexed document (exhibit 'J') within two weeks and issued notice to respondents returnable on 30.06.2026. The petitioner was also permitted to serve respondents 4 and 5 through private service with an affidavit to be filed at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted permission to the petitioner to replace an incorrectly annexed document (exhibit 'J') within two weeks and issued notice to respondents returnable on 30.06.2026. The petitioner was also permitted to serve respondents 4 and 5 through private service with an affidavit to be filed at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case