Chandrakant Kashinath Pawar vs The State of Maharashtra — IA/1210/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397 and 401. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010180862026

e-Filing Number

09-04-2026

Filing Number

IA/7570/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/1210/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397 and 401

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandrakant Kashinath Pawar

    Adv. KISHAN CHAUDHARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted the applicant's request to suspend his sentence pending appeal in a sexual harassment case under IPC Section 354-A(1)(i). The court found the six-month sentence was short-term, the applicant had remained bail-compliant during trial without misusing liberty, and ordered suspension subject to furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1210/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted the applicant's request to suspend his sentence pending appeal in a sexual harassment case under IPC Section 354-A(1)(i). The court found the six-month sentence was short-term, the applicant had remained bail-compliant during trial without misusing liberty, and ordered suspension subject to furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case