PREM BHARAT NANDRE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — BA/1704/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010180522026

Filing Number

BA/7555/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA/1704/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),351(3),3(5)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act 2012 Section 3(A),4,5(m),6,11(6),12,14(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PREM BHARAT NANDRE

    Adv. Jayendra D Khairnar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

  2. 2.MADHURI NARENDRA KHAIRNAR

    Adv. Aleema Bohra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted bail to Prem Bharat Nandre in a POCSO case involving alleged sexual assault of a minor, finding that his name was wrongly mentioned in the FIR due to misunderstanding and noting the delay in lodging the complaint. The applicant was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and regular police station attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/1704/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted bail to Prem Bharat Nandre in a POCSO case involving alleged sexual assault of a minor, finding that his name was wrongly mentioned in the FIR due to misunderstanding and noting the delay in lodging the complaint. The applicant was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and regular police station attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case