RUDRAPRATAP TRIPATHI vs MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS — HCBM10180232026

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010180232026

Filing Number

WP/10481/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

DEVELOPEMENT PERMISSION ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUDRAPRATAP TRIPATHI

    Adv. KAMALESH KUMAR TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS

  2. 2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, THANE

  3. 3.MAHARASHTRA BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary Writ Petition No. 10481 of 2026 filed by Rudrapratap Tripathi against MMRDA and others was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after initial notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension to cure defects, warning that failure to remove objections will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Writ Petition No. 10481 of 2026 filed by Rudrapratap Tripathi against MMRDA and others was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after initial notification on 23rd/24th April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension to cure defects, warning that failure to remove objections will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case