THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD., MUMBAI vs NIMISHA JITENDRA DODIA AND ANR — IA/3315/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010179252026

Filing Number

IA/10415/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/3315/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD., MUMBAI

    Adv. Devendranath Shrikant Joshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIMISHA JITENDRA DODIA AND ANR

  2. 2.JITENDRA KALABHAI DODIA @ JITENDRA BACHHUBHAI DODIA(DELETED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL)

    Adv. JITENDRA GOR

  3. 3.M/S. I.R. ENTERPRISES, RAIGAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    For Circulation ( First Appeal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay allowed The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.'s interim application and restored First Appeal (Stamp) No. 4411 of 2024, with the respondents offering no objection to the restoration. The brief order did not elaborate on the substantive merits of the underlying insurance dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  5. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3315/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay allowed The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.'s interim application and restored First Appeal (Stamp) No. 4411 of 2024, with the respondents offering no objection to the restoration. The brief order did not elaborate on the substantive merits of the underlying insurance dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case