Neil Karani UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India THR Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance AND ORS — WP/989/2026
Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 122. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010179182025
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
e-Filing Number
19-03-2025
Filing Number
WP/11613/2025
Filing Date
27-03-2025
Registration No
WP/989/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Neil Karani UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES
Respondent(s)
Union of India THR Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance AND ORS
State of Maharashtra THR Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue.
Joint Commissioner CGST and CEX Raigad
Commissioner of CGST and CEX Raigad
Deputy Commissioner of CGST and CEX Raigad
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-01-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 09-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 30-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 989/2026 The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief to petitioner Neil Karani, an independent company director, against GST penalty proceedings. The court found a strong prima facie case that individuals don't fall under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act 2017 and directed that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner pending further orders. The case is adjourned to 30th June 2026, with respondents given three weeks to file their reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 989/2026 The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief to petitioner Neil Karani, an independent company director, against GST penalty proceedings. The court found a strong prima facie case that individuals don't fall under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act 2017 and directed that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner pending further orders. The case is adjourned to 30th June 2026, with respondents given three weeks to file their reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts