JAFAR AKBAR SAYYED vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1696/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM010179012026

Filing Number

BA/7504/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA/1696/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(C),126(2),316(2),318(4),336(2),336(3),340(2)
Information Technology Act Section 66(C),66(D)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAFAR AKBAR SAYYED

    Adv. PAVAN PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

    Case BA/1696/2026 Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Jafar Akbar Sayyed's criminal bail application on 7th May 2026 as withdrawn. The applicant's counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh application before the Trial Court, arguing that co-accused persons with greater attributed roles had already been granted bail by the Sessions Court. The court permitted withdrawal as requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/1696/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case BA/1696/2026 Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Jafar Akbar Sayyed's criminal bail application on 7th May 2026 as withdrawn. The applicant's counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh application before the Trial Court, arguing that co-accused persons with greater attributed roles had already been granted bail by the Sessions Court. The court permitted withdrawal as requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case