NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD. vs M/S. GITA CORPORATION Advocate - Yash K Agrawal — CRA/244/2026
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010178642026
Filing Number
CRA/10375/2026
Filing Date
08-04-2026
Registration No
CRA/244/2026
Registration Date
17-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATIONS ( 67 )
Sub-Category
Against Order of Presidency / Provincial Small Causes Courts under the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD.
Adv. KUNAL CHHEDA
Respondent(s)
M/S. GITA CORPORATION Advocate - Yash K Agrawal
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary: CRA 244/2026 National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. v. M/s. Gita Corporation The High Court of Bombay set aside the lower courts' mesne profits award of Rs.12,14,660/month, reducing it to Rs.5,80,000/month with 6% interest for the period June 1, 2010 to November 16, 2014. The court found the respondent's valuation report fundamentally flawed—it compared a rear-located godown without road frontage to premium commercial shops in high-value areas like Napean Sea Road and Opera House, and relied on hypothetical improvements unsupported by evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRA 244/2026 National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. v. M/s. Gita Corporation The High Court of Bombay set aside the lower courts' mesne profits award of Rs.12,14,660/month, reducing it to Rs.5,80,000/month with 6% interest for the period June 1, 2010 to November 16, 2014. The court found the respondent's valuation report fundamentally flawed—it compared a rear-located godown without road frontage to premium commercial shops in high-value areas like Napean Sea Road and Opera House, and relied on hypothetical improvements unsupported by evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts