AYUSH SANTOSHRAO BHAVSAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1679/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010178332026

Filing Number

BA/7476/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA/1679/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,352,351(2),3(5)
Arms Act Section 4,25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AYUSH SANTOSHRAO BHAVSAR

    Adv. HRISHIKESH P GIRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay granted bail to Ayush Santoshrao Bhavsar, who had been incarcerated for over seven months in connection with an alleged conspiracy to murder. The court found that while the applicant's name did not appear in the FIR and conspiracy charges remained unproven, his prolonged detention without trial progress and clean antecedents warranted release. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, non-interference with witnesses, and regular police attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/1679/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay granted bail to Ayush Santoshrao Bhavsar, who had been incarcerated for over seven months in connection with an alleged conspiracy to murder. The court found that while the applicant's name did not appear in the FIR and conspiracy charges remained unproven, his prolonged detention without trial progress and clean antecedents warranted release. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, non-interference with witnesses, and regular police attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case