SHRI. SUNNI MAHESH HOTCHANDANI vs M/S. VAISHNAVI DEVELOPERS THR ITS PARTNERS. VAISHALI SHIVAJIRAO JONDHALE — HCBM10177672026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 115. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010177672026

Filing Number

CRA/10318/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATIONS ( 67 )

Sub-Category

Against Order of Civil Court (Except under Rent Act) ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. SUNNI MAHESH HOTCHANDANI

    Adv. KAYVAL P SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. VAISHNAVI DEVELOPERS THR ITS PARTNERS. VAISHALI SHIVAJIRAO JONDHALE

  2. 2.SHRI VASANT GANESH PHADKE

  3. 3.SHRI SUNIL VASANT PHADKE

  4. 4.SHRI SHAILESH VASANT PHADKE

  5. 5.SMT. SUNITA VASANT PHADKE SINCE DECEASED THR LRS MRS SHUBHA JAYANT GUPTE(Legal Heir)5.

  6. 6.MRS. SHUBHA JAYANT GUPTE5.

  7. 7.MRS. SHILPA ANANT CHAPHEKAR

  8. 8.SAU. SHUSHMA SUNIL PHADKE

  9. 9.SAU. SUVARNA SHAILESH

  10. 10.BHARGAV SHAILESH PHADKE

  11. 11.MS. KETKI SHAILESH PHADKE

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF

    Case Summary: In Civil Revision Application Stamp No. 10318 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court (Thane District), the Registrar directed the applicant's advocate to remove office objections within two weeks as a final opportunity. The court warned that failure to comply would result in refusal of registration and other necessary orders on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    For Notification (Objection Not Removed)

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Civil Revision Application Stamp No. 10318 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court (Thane District), the Registrar directed the applicant's advocate to remove office objections within two weeks as a final opportunity. The court warned that failure to comply would result in refusal of registration and other necessary orders on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case