RAVINDRA DAGUJI THAKARE vs THE ADMINISTRATOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS — WP/5896/2026

Case under Bombay Village Panchayat Act Section NA. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010177502026

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/10309/2026

Filing Date

08-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5896/2026

Registration Date

29-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Bombay Village Panchayat Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

RAVINDRA DAGUJI THAKARE

Adv. RAMESHWAR GITE

Respondent(s)

THE ADMINISTRATOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ORS

THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PANCHAYAT SAMITI

THE SECRETARY, GRAMPANCHAYAT VITAVE

THE MINISTER FOR VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ, STATE MAHARASHTRA

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TO BE SERVED THRO AGP

SAINATH NAGUJI KOLHE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

04-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

15-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

04-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Summary: Writ Petition No.5896 of 2026 filed by Ravindra Daguji Thakare against the Administrator/CEO and others was heard on 4 May 2026. The High Court of Bombay issued notice to the respondents for final disposal, with the matter made returnable on 15 June 2026. Service was waived for Respondent Nos.4 and 5, while the petitioner was permitted to serve remaining respondents by private service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Writ Petition No.5896 of 2026 filed by Ravindra Daguji Thakare against the Administrator/CEO and others was heard on 4 May 2026. The High Court of Bombay issued notice to the respondents for final disposal, with the matter made returnable on 15 June 2026. Service was waived for Respondent Nos.4 and 5, while the petitioner was permitted to serve remaining respondents by private service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case