M/S SHRI LAKSHMI STEELS vs UNION OF INDIA THROU. THE SEC. MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE AND ORS — HCBM10177342026

Case under Customs Act, 1962. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010177342026

Filing Number

WP/10297/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

IMPORT POLICY ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Customs Act, 1962

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SHRI LAKSHMI STEELS

    Adv. ZAINAB

  2. 2.SHRI ABHAY JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THROU. THE SEC. MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM IMPORT-I MUMBAI

  3. 3.THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAT DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE LUDHIANA ZONAL UNIT

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) adjourned Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 10297 of 2026 filed by M/S Shri Lakshmi Steels and Shri Abhay Jain against the Union of India and customs/revenue authorities. The petitioners failed to remove office objections after notification on 8 May 2026. Rather than refuse registration outright under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted a two-week extension to cure the defects. If objections remain unremoved, the petition will be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) adjourned Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 10297 of 2026 filed by M/S Shri Lakshmi Steels and Shri Abhay Jain against the Union of India and customs/revenue authorities. The petitioners failed to remove office objections after notification on 8 May 2026. Rather than refuse registration outright under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted a two-week extension to cure the defects. If objections remain unremoved, the petition will be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case