HILLARY CLEMENT DSOUZA @ LAWRY AND HILLARY CLEMENT DSOUZA (DECEASED) THR. VERONICA HILLARY CLEMENT vs OPHELIA THEOFILO DEABRUE AND ORS. — CRA/222/2023

Case under Rent Act Section 19. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Next hearing 15-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM010176382023

Filing Number

CRA/10488/2023

Filing Date

11-Apr-2023

Registration No

CRA/222/2023

Registration Date

21-Apr-2023

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 03-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Rent Act Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HILLARY CLEMENT DSOUZA @ LAWRY AND HILLARY CLEMENT DSOUZA (DECEASED) THR. VERONICA HILLARY CLEMENT

    Adv. Pooja

  2. 2.VERONICA HILLARY CLEMENT

  3. 3.PREETI HILLARY DSOUZA

  4. 4.ANNAPRIYA HILLARY DSOUZA

  5. 5.PRAKASH HILLARY DSOUZA

  6. 6.PRAVIN HILLARY DSOUZA

  7. 7.PREM HILLARY DSOUZA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.OPHELIA THEOFILO DEABRUE AND ORS.

  2. 2.MISS. LORRETTE ANTHONY TRAVASSO

  3. 3.ANNETTE PADDY MCKOY

  4. 4.ALEX ANTHONY TRAVASSO (SINCE DECEASED)

  5. 5.VALERIAN NOEL ANTHONY TRAVASSO

  6. 6.IRIS TERRACE TRAVASSO

  7. 7.IGNATIUS TERRACE TRAVASSO (SINCE DECEASED)

  8. 8.ARVINL FRANCIS CUTINHO

  9. 9.EYELYN PAULO LOBO

  10. 10.GWENDLYLIN NORMAN FERNADES

  11. 11.RENARD FERNEDES

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    For Orders (Spare Copy/Ies Not Supplied)

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF

    Case Status Summary: Civil Revision Application No. 222 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) is adjourned for two weeks. The Registrar granted an additional opportunity to the Appellant's advocate to supply necessary copies for issuing notices to Respondents, which were not supplied despite a previous two-week extension. The application will be dismissed for non-prosecution if copies are not supplied within the prescribed two-week timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF

  6. 19-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  7. 19-Aug-2023

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  8. 17-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  9. 17-Aug-2023

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  10. 27-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  11. 27-Jul-2023

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  12. 20-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  13. 20-Jul-2023

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  14. 13-Jul-2023

    At 2.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  15. 23-Jun-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  16. 23-Jun-2023

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  17. 06-Jun-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  18. 06-Jun-2023

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  19. 28-Apr-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  20. 28-Apr-2023

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  21. 27-Apr-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  22. 27-Apr-2023

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  23. 26-Apr-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  24. 26-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 11-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/222/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary: Civil Revision Application No. 222 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) is adjourned for two weeks. The Registrar granted an additional opportunity to the Appellant's advocate to supply necessary copies for issuing notices to Respondents, which were not supplied despite a previous two-week extension. The application will be dismissed for non-prosecution if copies are not supplied within the prescribed two-week timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case