SANJAY B. SALVI vs THE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR — WP/4686/2026

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010175432026

Filing Number

WP/10197/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/4686/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Cooperative Socities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY B. SALVI

    Adv. AMIT

  2. 2.SANJAY KUCKIAN

  3. 3.MADHU A.V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR

  3. 3.SANDEEP DEJAPPA POOJARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court rejected the interim relief sought by three Managing Committee members of a co-operative housing society challenging the appointment of an Authorised Officer due to loss of quorum (reduced from 10 to 8 members). Since the Authorised Officer had already taken charge, the court found no grounds to stay the appointment order. However, the court directed the Authorised Officer to conduct society elections and constitute a duly elected Managing Committee within two months to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4686/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court rejected the interim relief sought by three Managing Committee members of a co-operative housing society challenging the appointment of an Authorised Officer due to loss of quorum (reduced from 10 to 8 members). Since the Authorised Officer had already taken charge, the court found no grounds to stay the appointment order. However, the court directed the Authorised Officer to conduct society elections and constitute a duly elected Managing Committee within two months to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case