SANJAY SARRAF vs THE JOINT REGISTRAR (SRA) CO-OP, SOC. — HCBM10174692026

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010174692026

Filing Number

WP/10161/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Cooperative Socities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY SARRAF

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE JOINT REGISTRAR (SRA) CO-OP, SOC.

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO-OP SOC.

  3. 3.VINAY AJITKUMAR SARAWGI

  4. 4.RAJENDRA BHORKAR

  5. 5.DROPATI GODAMBE

  6. 6.AJAY HANDA

  7. 7.PRASHANT CHOTANI

  8. 8.THE MUMBAI DISTRICT FEDERATION MUMBAI

  9. 9.THE ESTATE MANAGER MHADA (BANDRA DIVISION)

  10. 10.THE OSHIWARA LINK PLAZA COMM. PREMISES CO-OP. SOC. LTD

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary Writ Petition No. 10161 of 2026 (Bombay High Court) Petitioner Sanjay Sarraf's writ petition failed to remove office objections by the April 23-24, 2026 deadline. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, the court granted a final two-week extension for the petitioner and advocate to cure the defects. If office objections remain unresolved, the petition will be rejected per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Writ Petition No. 10161 of 2026 (Bombay High Court) Petitioner Sanjay Sarraf's writ petition failed to remove office objections by the April 23-24, 2026 deadline. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, the court granted a final two-week extension for the petitioner and advocate to cure the defects. If office objections remain unresolved, the petition will be rejected per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case