GURUMUKH NIWAS SAHAKARI GRUHRACHANA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION)THRO. ITS PRINCIPAL — HCBM10174342026

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010174342026

Filing Number

WP/10145/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Cooperative Socities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURUMUKH NIWAS SAHAKARI GRUHRACHANA

    Adv. V H Narvekar

  2. 2.RAHUL ASHOK MAHAJAN

  3. 3.ROHIT ASHOK MAHAJAN

  4. 4.RAMDAS NIVRUTTI PAWAR

  5. 5.RENUKA RAKESH KHATRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (DEPT. OF CO-OPERATION)THRO. ITS PRINCIPAL

  2. 2.THE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES PUNE CITY

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES PUNE CITY (

  4. 4.THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER C/O THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES PUNE CITY (

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary Writ Petition No. 10145 of 2026 - Bombay High Court The petitioners (Gurumukh Niwas Sahakari Gruhrachana and Rahul Ashok Mahajan and Rohit Ashok Mahajan) failed to remove office objections after being notified on 8 May 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted them an additional two weeks to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Writ Petition No. 10145 of 2026 - Bombay High Court The petitioners (Gurumukh Niwas Sahakari Gruhrachana and Rahul Ashok Mahajan and Rohit Ashok Mahajan) failed to remove office objections after being notified on 8 May 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted them an additional two weeks to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case