NEEL VIVEK UTAGI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. SECRETARY — WP/5533/2026
Case under Caste Certificate Act 1871 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010174062026
Filing Number
WP/10121/2026
Filing Date
07-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5533/2026
Registration Date
22-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Bench Type
Division
Category
CASTE SCRUTINY ( 48 )
Sub-Category
For admission of students ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NEEL VIVEK UTAGI
Adv. AJIT MAHADEV SAVAGAVE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. SECRETARY
DISTRICT CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTE, THANE
MATOSHREE PRABODHINI JUNIOR COLLEGE OF SCIENCE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
FOR DISPOSAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | FOR DISPOSAL |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking expedited processing of his Koshti caste validity certificate claim. The court rejected the request for priority, noting that thousands of students await certificates and the District Committee cannot prioritize one claim over others filed earlier; the petition was disposed with the observation that the claim would be considered in chronological order per filing dates, with efforts to decide it if the petitioner cooperates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking expedited processing of his Koshti caste validity certificate claim. The court rejected the request for priority, noting that thousands of students await certificates and the District Committee cannot prioritize one claim over others filed earlier; the petition was disposed with the observation that the claim would be considered in chronological order per filing dates, with efforts to decide it if the petitioner cooperates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts