NITESH ASHOK GAIKWAD vs MAHARASHTA STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER THRO. ITS SECRETARY — HCBM10173522026

Case under Representation of Peoples Act 1950,1951. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010173522026

Filing Number

WP/10091/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

ELECTION ( 12 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Representation of Peoples Act 1950,1951

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITESH ASHOK GAIKWAD

    Adv. HRISHIKESH SUNIL AVHAD

  2. 2.SWAPNIL BAJIRAO BHADALE

  3. 3.KADAM KIRAN BALU

  4. 4.ULHAS RAMCHANDRA SHEVALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTA STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER THRO. ITS SECRETARY

  2. 2.PRASAD SHINGTE

  3. 3.RETURNING OFFICER, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,

  4. 4.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY

  5. 5.DHORE GIRISH KAILAS

  6. 6.DHORE USHA KAILAS

  7. 7.HARPALE SACHIN NANDKUMAR

  8. 8.JAWANJAL SNEHAL RAMCHANDRA

  9. 9.DEVKATE SACHIN RAYCHAND

  10. 10.ROKADE SAMBHAJI KONDIBA

  11. 11.HARPALE VISHAKHA SANDIP

  12. 12.ADHALE SWATI LAXMAN

  13. 13.KAMATHE OMKAR MACHINDRA

  14. 14.HARPALE MAHESH GULAB

  15. 15.KAMATHE AMRUTA DHANANJAY

  16. 16.ABNAVE SANTOSH KHANDU

  17. 17.PAWAR MONIKA NILESH

  18. 18.KAMATHE GANESH BALASO

  19. 19.HARPALE SUDHA SANJAY

  20. 20.DHORE GANESH BALASAHEB

  21. 21.SHEVALE SUKANYA PRAKASH

  22. 22.HARPALE AMIT SHANKAR

  23. 23.DHAMAL USHA NARSINGH

  24. 24.DHAMAL AJINKYA SHIVAJI

  25. 25.ADVOCATE AMOL KAPARE

  26. 26.DESHMUKH SHITOLE PRACHI SHIVPRASAD

  27. 27.DHAMAL CHANDRAKANT DHONDIBA

  28. 28.DHUMAL BHAVAN AJINKYA

  29. 29.HARPALE SHITAL AMIT

  30. 30.HARPALE SANTOSH RAMESH

  31. 31.BHADALE SHARDA BHAIRU

  32. 32.BHADALE PRASHANT VILAS

  33. 33.ABNAVE PALLAVI GORAKH

  34. 34.BHADALE VIKAS VINAYAK

  35. 35.SARODE SANTOSH FAKIRA

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 10091 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, petitioners Nitesh Ashok Gaikwad, Swapnil Bajirao Bhadale, and Kadam Kiran Balu failed to remove office objections within the prescribed timeframe. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted them a final two-week extension to cure the defects, with a warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 10091 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, petitioners Nitesh Ashok Gaikwad, Swapnil Bajirao Bhadale, and Kadam Kiran Balu failed to remove office objections within the prescribed timeframe. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted them a final two-week extension to cure the defects, with a warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case