MOHD EAJAZ MOHD LATIF SEAIKH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/922/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010173512026

Filing Number

ABA/7260/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

ABA/922/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 3(5),318(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD EAJAZ MOHD LATIF SEAIKH

    Adv. Govind Mourya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Mohd Eajaz Mohd Latif Seaikh's anticipatory bail application (No. 922 of 2026) on 17 April 2026. The applicant's counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the application, and the court accordingly dismissed it as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/922/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Mohd Eajaz Mohd Latif Seaikh's anticipatory bail application (No. 922 of 2026) on 17 April 2026. The applicant's counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the application, and the court accordingly dismissed it as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case