PRAKASH N VYANKATESHWARAO vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1646/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010172602026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA/7240/2026

Filing Date

06-04-2026

Registration No

BA/1646/2026

Registration Date

07-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(C),22(C)

Petitioner(s)

PRAKASH N VYANKATESHWARAO

Adv. Susmit Paradkar

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

15-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

05-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Case Summary: BA/1646/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Prakash N Vyankateshwarao in a drug trafficking case involving 86.91 kg of ganja seized from a truck. The court held the applicant entitled to bail on the principle of parity, noting he had been incarcerated for over four years and four months while a co-accused with similar charges was already released on bail. Bail was granted on Rs. 30,000 P.R. Bond with sureties and conditions prohibiting evidence tampering or witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA/1646/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Prakash N Vyankateshwarao in a drug trafficking case involving 86.91 kg of ganja seized from a truck. The court held the applicant entitled to bail on the principle of parity, noting he had been incarcerated for over four years and four months while a co-accused with similar charges was already released on bail. Bail was granted on Rs. 30,000 P.R. Bond with sureties and conditions prohibiting evidence tampering or witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case