MAHESHPRASAD SITARAM MAHATO vs CHANDRASHEKHAR MOTILAL YADAV AND ORS. — IA/3671/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010172482026

Filing Number

IA/10012/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/3671/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Against Order of Civil Court - Single Bench ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHPRASAD SITARAM MAHATO

    Adv. HEMANT GHADIGAONKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRASHEKHAR MOTILAL YADAV AND ORS.

  2. 2.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  3. 3.TRAIX DEVELOPER

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    Case Summary: IA 3671/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents Chandrashekhar Motilal Yadav and others returnable on 8th July 2026 in this interim application filed by appellant Maheshprasad Sitaram Mahato. The court directed the appellant's advocate to serve respondents by private notice through all possible modes and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters Auto Listed

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3671/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA 3671/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents Chandrashekhar Motilal Yadav and others returnable on 8th July 2026 in this interim application filed by appellant Maheshprasad Sitaram Mahato. The court directed the appellant's advocate to serve respondents by private notice through all possible modes and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case