ANJANABI PRALHAD JADHAV vs VASANT SUBHASH SHAH AND ANR Advocate - VIMLESH SINGH — WP/4825/2026

Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010171442026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/9962/2026

Filing Date

06-04-2026

Registration No

WP/4825/2026

Registration Date

10-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Bench Type

Single

Category

RENT ACT ( 34 )

Sub-Category

INTERIM ORDER/AD-INTERIM ORDER PASSED IN RENT ACT MATTERS ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

ANJANABI PRALHAD JADHAV

Adv. Adv Shriram S Redij

Respondent(s)

VASANT SUBHASH SHAH AND ANR Advocate - VIMLESH SINGH

RAJU SUBHASH SHAH

Adv. VIMLESH SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

17-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

24-04-2026

FOR SETTLEMENT / CONSENT TERMS

22-04-2026

- FOR SETTLEMENT -

Orders

24-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Case Summary: WP/4825/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Anjanabai Pralhad Jadav against Vasanti Subhash Shah and another after the parties amicably resolved their disputes through consent terms. The court accepted the signed consent terms as binding undertakings, with all signatories present before the bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4825/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Anjanabai Pralhad Jadav against Vasanti Subhash Shah and another after the parties amicably resolved their disputes through consent terms. The court accepted the signed consent terms as binding undertakings, with all signatories present before the bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case