ANJANABI PRALHAD JADHAV vs VASANT SUBHASH SHAH AND ANR Advocate - VIMLESH SINGH — WP/4825/2026
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010171442026
Filing Number
WP/9962/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/4825/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
INTERIM ORDER/AD-INTERIM ORDER PASSED IN RENT ACT MATTERS ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANJANABI PRALHAD JADHAV
Adv. Adv Shriram S Redij
Respondent(s)
-
1.VASANT SUBHASH SHAH AND ANR Advocate - VIMLESH SINGH
-
2.RAJU SUBHASH SHAH
Adv. VIMLESH SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
Case Summary: WP/4825/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Anjanabai Pralhad Jadav against Vasanti Subhash Shah and another after the parties amicably resolved their disputes through consent terms. The court accepted the signed consent terms as binding undertakings, with all signatories present before the bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
For Settlement / Consent Terms
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
- For Settlement -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4825/2026
Case Summary: WP/4825/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Anjanabai Pralhad Jadav against Vasanti Subhash Shah and another after the parties amicably resolved their disputes through consent terms. The court accepted the signed consent terms as binding undertakings, with all signatories present before the bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts