RAHUL TEJA INDRAJEET SINGH vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1641/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010171412026

Filing Number

BA/7181/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA/1641/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 457,380,460,302,201,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL TEJA INDRAJEET SINGH

    Adv. A R Bukhari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court granted bail to Rahul Teja Indrajeet Singh in a murder case where he had been imprisoned for 8 years without trial. The court found that the evidence against him was indistinguishable from his co-accused, who had already been granted bail, and applied the principle of parity. The applicant was released on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with multiple conditions including mandatory court attendance, monthly police station reporting, and restrictions on leaving Maharashtra or India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Circulation -1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/1641/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court granted bail to Rahul Teja Indrajeet Singh in a murder case where he had been imprisoned for 8 years without trial. The court found that the evidence against him was indistinguishable from his co-accused, who had already been granted bail, and applied the principle of parity. The applicant was released on a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with multiple conditions including mandatory court attendance, monthly police station reporting, and restrictions on leaving Maharashtra or India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case