SHAIKH FAIZAN FAROOQ @ PRINCE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1636/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010171282026
Filing Number
BA/7178/2026
Filing Date
06-04-2026
Registration No
BA/1636/2026
Registration Date
06-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAIKH FAIZAN FAROOQ @ PRINCE
Adv. Akshay Bankapur
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 04-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court granted bail to Shaikh Faizan Farooq @ Prince in a narcotic drugs case involving alleged possession and distribution of 6.5 grams of Mephedrone. The court found that while allegations against the applicant require trial to be proven, the fact that a similarly-situated co-accused had already been released on bail, combined with six months of detention, warranted bail on furnishing a Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties and standard conditions against evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court granted bail to Shaikh Faizan Farooq @ Prince in a narcotic drugs case involving alleged possession and distribution of 6.5 grams of Mephedrone. The court found that while allegations against the applicant require trial to be proven, the fact that a similarly-situated co-accused had already been released on bail, combined with six months of detention, warranted bail on furnishing a Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties and standard conditions against evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts