ADITYA @ BILLA SUNIL JARAS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1640/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010171052026
Filing Number
BA/7169/2026
Filing Date
06-04-2026
Registration No
BA/1640/2026
Registration Date
06-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ADITYA @ BILLA SUNIL JARAS
Adv. Amit Pradhan
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 05-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
The Bombay High Court granted bail to Aditya @ Billa Sunil Jaras in a dacoity case, finding that while he was arrested based on co-accused statements, formal evidence was required to prove involvement and eight months' detention was sufficient. The applicant was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with one or two sureties, subject to conditions including attending police station when called and not tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court granted bail to Aditya @ Billa Sunil Jaras in a dacoity case, finding that while he was arrested based on co-accused statements, formal evidence was required to prove involvement and eight months' detention was sufficient. The applicant was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with one or two sureties, subject to conditions including attending police station when called and not tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts