BABAN DHEKANE vs HAFFKINE BIO PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION LTD AND ORS — IA/2835/2026
Case under Service Matter Section 226. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010168922026
Filing Number
IA/9778/2026
Filing Date
04-Apr-2026
Registration No
IA/2835/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Bench Type
Division
Category
OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )
Sub-Category
ALL OTHER SERVICE MATTERS - DB ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABAN DHEKANE
Adv. Pratik Irpatgire
Respondent(s)
-
1.HAFFKINE BIO PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION LTD AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Baban Dhekane's interim application seeking permission to retain his original posting at Parel and official residential accommodation following his transfer to ATS Pimpri. The court rejected the relief because the applicant suppressed material facts—specifically, that he owns a residence in Bhosri and has been claiming HRA (House Rent Allowance) from the respondent corporation. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
04-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/2835/2026
Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Baban Dhekane's interim application seeking permission to retain his original posting at Parel and official residential accommodation following his transfer to ATS Pimpri. The court rejected the relief because the applicant suppressed material facts—specifically, that he owns a residence in Bhosri and has been claiming HRA (House Rent Allowance) from the respondent corporation. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts