BABAN DHEKANE vs HAFFKINE BIO PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION LTD AND ORS — IA/2835/2026

Case under Service Matter Section 226. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010168922026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

IA/9778/2026

Filing Date

04-04-2026

Registration No

IA/2835/2026

Registration Date

09-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Bench Type

Division

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

ALL OTHER SERVICE MATTERS - DB ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Service Matter Section 226

Petitioner(s)

BABAN DHEKANE

Adv. Pratik Irpatgire

Respondent(s)

HAFFKINE BIO PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION LTD AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

05-05-2026

FOR DIRECTION

17-06-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA,HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Baban Dhekane's interim application seeking permission to retain his original posting at Parel and official residential accommodation following his transfer to ATS Pimpri. The court rejected the relief because the applicant suppressed material facts—specifically, that he owns a residence in Bhosri and has been claiming HRA (House Rent Allowance) from the respondent corporation. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Baban Dhekane's interim application seeking permission to retain his original posting at Parel and official residential accommodation following his transfer to ATS Pimpri. The court rejected the relief because the applicant suppressed material facts—specifically, that he owns a residence in Bhosri and has been claiming HRA (House Rent Allowance) from the respondent corporation. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case