ISMAT SHARAFAT ALI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1626/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010168552026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA/7096/2026

Filing Date

04-04-2026

Registration No

BA/1626/2026

Registration Date

06-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 143(3),3(5)
Supression of Immoral Traffic in Women,girls Act Section 3,4,5,7

Petitioner(s)

ISMAT SHARAFAT ALI

Adv. Premkumar Mishra

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

15-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

05-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Case Summary: BA/1626/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Ismat Sharafat Ali, accused of managing a spa involved in prostitution under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Immoral Traffic Prevention Act. The court found that after four months of detention with completed investigation and charge-sheet filed, plus similar co-accused already released on bail, bail was justified. Bail was granted on Rs.30,000 P.R. Bond with conditions prohibiting witness tampering or evidence interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA/1626/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Ismat Sharafat Ali, accused of managing a spa involved in prostitution under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Immoral Traffic Prevention Act. The court found that after four months of detention with completed investigation and charge-sheet filed, plus similar co-accused already released on bail, bail was justified. Bail was granted on Rs.30,000 P.R. Bond with conditions prohibiting witness tampering or evidence interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case