ISMAT SHARAFAT ALI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1626/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010168552026

Filing Number

BA/7096/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA/1626/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 143(3),3(5)
Supression of Immoral Traffic in Women,girls Act Section 3,4,5,7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISMAT SHARAFAT ALI

    Adv. Premkumar Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

    Case Summary: BA/1626/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Ismat Sharafat Ali, accused of managing a spa involved in prostitution under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Immoral Traffic Prevention Act. The court found that after four months of detention with completed investigation and charge-sheet filed, plus similar co-accused already released on bail, bail was justified. Bail was granted on Rs.30,000 P.R. Bond with conditions prohibiting witness tampering or evidence interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/1626/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA/1626/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Ismat Sharafat Ali, accused of managing a spa involved in prostitution under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Immoral Traffic Prevention Act. The court found that after four months of detention with completed investigation and charge-sheet filed, plus similar co-accused already released on bail, bail was justified. Bail was granted on Rs.30,000 P.R. Bond with conditions prohibiting witness tampering or evidence interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case