Anand Rajesham Mittapelli vs Presiding Officer — CP/236/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 88. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010166692026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

02-04-2026

Filing Number

CP/9651/2026

Filing Date

02-04-2026

Registration No

CP/236/2026

Registration Date

17-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT Section 88

Petitioner(s)

Anand Rajesham Mittapelli

Adv. Vivek Machha

Radha Anand Mittapelli

Adv. MACHHA VIVEK NAGABHUSHANAM

Respondent(s)

Presiding Officer

Nandita Mahadik

Capri Global Capital Limited

Capri Global Housing Finance Limited

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

23-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Summary of CP/236/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the contempt petition filed by Anand Rajesham Mittapelli against the Presiding Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT-III), finding it "thoroughly misconceived." The court held that the DRT had complied with its prior March 10, 2026 order by taking up and disposing of the interim application on the directed date of March 11, 2026, thereby establishing no case of disobedience of court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CP/236/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the contempt petition filed by Anand Rajesham Mittapelli against the Presiding Officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT-III), finding it "thoroughly misconceived." The court held that the DRT had complied with its prior March 10, 2026 order by taking up and disposing of the interim application on the directed date of March 11, 2026, thereby establishing no case of disobedience of court directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Contempt of Courts Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case