HAEDAR ABDULKHADAR SAYYED vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1608/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010166362026
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
BA/7005/2026
Filing Date
02-04-2026
Registration No
BA/1608/2026
Registration Date
04-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAEDAR ABDULKHADAR SAYYED
Adv. FAISAL F. SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
UNION OF INDIA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR CIRCULATION -1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | |
| 19-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 04-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 28-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION -1 |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed Haedar Abdulkhadar Sayyed's bail application as withdrawn, allowing him to file a fresh bail application before the Trial Court. The applicant's counsel sought withdrawal citing that the co-accused had been granted bail, and the court permitted this with liberty to pursue the matter on its merits before the Trial Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed Haedar Abdulkhadar Sayyed's bail application as withdrawn, allowing him to file a fresh bail application before the Trial Court. The applicant's counsel sought withdrawal citing that the co-accused had been granted bail, and the court permitted this with liberty to pursue the matter on its merits before the Trial Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts