MOHAMMED AMIN MOHAMMED HASAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1603/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010166082026
Filing Number
BA/6991/2026
Filing Date
02-04-2026
Registration No
BA/1603/2026
Registration Date
04-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMMED AMIN MOHAMMED HASAN
Adv. Mateen Shaikh
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR CIRCULATION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
DUE ADMISSION - 1
DUE ADMISSION - 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 28-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 24-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
Orders
Court Decision Summary The Bombay High Court granted bail to Mohammed Amin Mohammed Hasan (Accused No. 222) in a birth certificate fraud case involving 269 accused persons. The court applied the principle of parity, noting that co-accused with similar roles had already been released on bail, and the applicant had no criminal record and spent over 1 year in custody. Bail was granted on strict conditions including a ₹2,00,000 bond, a ban on entering Malegaon jurisdiction (except for court appearances), monthly police reporting, and restrictions on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Bombay High Court granted bail to Mohammed Amin Mohammed Hasan (Accused No. 222) in a birth certificate fraud case involving 269 accused persons. The court applied the principle of parity, noting that co-accused with similar roles had already been released on bail, and the applicant had no criminal record and spent over 1 year in custody. Bail was granted on strict conditions including a ₹2,00,000 bond, a ban on entering Malegaon jurisdiction (except for court appearances), monthly police reporting, and restrictions on witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts