SARIKA SURAJ RAHATAL ALIAS SARIKA DNYANESHWAR BHOJANE vs SURAJ PRAKASH RAHATAL — MCA/111/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 24. Next hearing: 07th August 2026.

Next hearing 07-Aug-2026

CNR: HCBM010164662026

e-Filing Number

31-03-2026

Filing Number

MCA/9521/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCA/111/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Category

TRANSFER OF CASES WITH IN THE STATE ( 59 )

Sub-Category

SUBORDINATE COURTS ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARIKA SURAJ RAHATAL ALIAS SARIKA DNYANESHWAR BHOJANE

    Adv. Ankur Narendra Jain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURAJ PRAKASH RAHATAL

Case History

  1. 07-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Aug-2026

    Fresh Matters Auto Listed

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

    Case Summary - MCA 111/2026 The Bombay High Court (Justice Rajesh S. Patil) issued notice to the respondent returnable on 07.08.2026 and granted ad-interim relief to the applicant under prayer clause (b). The applicant was permitted to serve the respondent through all permissible modes of service and directed to file an affidavit of service before the next hearing. The court also ordered communication of this order to the Civil Judge Senior Division in Sinnar, Nashik, who is hearing related matrimonial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCA/111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - MCA 111/2026 The Bombay High Court (Justice Rajesh S. Patil) issued notice to the respondent returnable on 07.08.2026 and granted ad-interim relief to the applicant under prayer clause (b). The applicant was permitted to serve the respondent through all permissible modes of service and directed to file an affidavit of service before the next hearing. The court also ordered communication of this order to the Civil Judge Senior Division in Sinnar, Nashik, who is hearing related matrimonial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case