HARAKU SAKHARAM CHOUDHARI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — WP/5111/2026

Case under Bombay Land Acquisition Act 1948 Section n. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010163812026

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/9467/2026

Filing Date

02-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5111/2026

Registration Date

17-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

ACQUISITION FOR CRZ PROJECTS ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Bombay Land Acquisition Act 1948 Section n

Petitioner(s)

HARAKU SAKHARAM CHOUDHARI

Adv. SUMANT RAJARAM DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NO. 22, PUNE

THE MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PUNE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

23-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

24-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned WP 5111/2026 to 24.06.2026. Petitioner Haraku Sakharam Choudhari challenged land acquisition proceedings, contending the acquisition lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, as neither possession was taken nor compensation paid. The court issued notice and directed respondents to file reply affidavits within four weeks, with rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned WP 5111/2026 to 24.06.2026. Petitioner Haraku Sakharam Choudhari challenged land acquisition proceedings, contending the acquisition lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, as neither possession was taken nor compensation paid. The court issued notice and directed respondents to file reply affidavits within four weeks, with rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case