NITIN MARUTI GAIKWAD vs YOGITA NITIN GAIKWAD — IA/3320/2026
Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010163332026
Filing Number
IA/9438/2026
Filing Date
01-04-2026
Registration No
IA/3320/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Bench Type
Division
Category
FAMILY LAW ( 16 )
Sub-Category
RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NITIN MARUTI GAIKWAD
Adv. SB
Respondent(s)
YOGITA NITIN GAIKWAD
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court condoned a 33-day delay in filing Nitin Maruti Gaikwad's Family Court Appeal against the September 17, 2025 judgment that dismissed his Restitution Petition and partly allowed the Divorce Petition. The court was satisfied with the applicant's bonafides, noting the delay resulted from lack of awareness of the order being passed, and directed the registry to register the First Appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court condoned a 33-day delay in filing Nitin Maruti Gaikwad's Family Court Appeal against the September 17, 2025 judgment that dismissed his Restitution Petition and partly allowed the Divorce Petition. The court was satisfied with the applicant's bonafides, noting the delay resulted from lack of awareness of the order being passed, and directed the registry to register the First Appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts