NITIN MARUTI GAIKWAD vs YOGITA NITIN GAIKWAD — IA/3320/2026

Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010163332026

Filing Number

IA/9438/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

IA/3320/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN MARUTI GAIKWAD

    Adv. SB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YOGITA NITIN GAIKWAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court condoned a 33-day delay in filing Nitin Maruti Gaikwad's Family Court Appeal against the September 17, 2025 judgment that dismissed his Restitution Petition and partly allowed the Divorce Petition. The court was satisfied with the applicant's bonafides, noting the delay resulted from lack of awareness of the order being passed, and directed the registry to register the First Appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3320/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court condoned a 33-day delay in filing Nitin Maruti Gaikwad's Family Court Appeal against the September 17, 2025 judgment that dismissed his Restitution Petition and partly allowed the Divorce Petition. The court was satisfied with the applicant's bonafides, noting the delay resulted from lack of awareness of the order being passed, and directed the registry to register the First Appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case