AASHIKA RAJKUAMR AJMERA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. THE DEPT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DRUGS AND ORS — HCBM10162692026
Case under Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutes(regulation of Admission and Fees)act. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010162692026
Filing Number
WP/9403/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
EDUCATION ( 11 )
Sub-Category
PROFESSIONAL COURSES ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AASHIKA RAJKUAMR AJMERA
Adv. M V Thorat
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. THE DEPT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DRUGS AND ORS
-
2.DIRECTOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESERACH ST. GEORGES HOSPITAL COMPOUND MUMBAI
-
3.STATE CET CELL THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER
-
4.VEDANTAA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
-
5.TERNA MEDICAL COLLAGE NAVI MUMBAI
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
In Writ Petition No. 9403 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner Aashika Rajkumar Ajmera two weeks additional time to cure office objections that were previously notified on 4th May 2026. The petition was adjudged deficient under Rule 3(ii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, and if the petitioner fails to remove these objections within the granted period, registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Objections To Be Removed
Assistant Registrar
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
In Writ Petition No. 9403 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner Aashika Rajkumar Ajmera two weeks additional time to cure office objections that were previously notified on 4th May 2026. The petition was adjudged deficient under Rule 3(ii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, and if the petitioner fails to remove these objections within the granted period, registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts