ANJUM E FAIZE SHABBIR AND ORS vs GORGINA ALIAS JEENA ALIAS JEANE Advocate - EVENTA ANDREA GONSALVES — WP/4351/2026

Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010162612026

Filing Number

WP/9396/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/4351/2026

Registration Date

04-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

RENT ACT ( 34 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANJUM E FAIZE SHABBIR AND ORS

    Adv. J Sagar Associates

  2. 2.MUSTANSIR ABDULLA LOKHANDWALA

  3. 3.HAKUMUDDIN MISTER S/O EBRAHIM MISTER

  4. 4.ISMAIL EBRAHIM SAIFY S/O EBRAHIM SAIFY

  5. 5.JUZER ASGAR CHAHWALA S/O ASGAR CHAHWALA

  6. 6.HIS HOLINESS DR. SYEDNA MUFFADDAL SAIFUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GORGINA ALIAS JEENA ALIAS JEANE Advocate - EVENTA ANDREA GONSALVES

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4351/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a Small Causes Court order that dismissed a plaint amendment application. The core issue was whether the suit was maintainable when filed by delegate attorneys (Plaintiffs 2-5) rather than the sole trustee (Petitioner No. 6) directly. Justice Sandeep V. Marne held that Plaintiff No. 3 possessed valid delegated authority under Powers of Attorney executed by Petitioner No. 6, making the objection to his authority unfounded. The court directed Petitioner No. 6 to file an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC for his direct impleadment as Plaintiff within 2 weeks, with the trial court to decide expeditiously by 30 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4351/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4351/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a Small Causes Court order that dismissed a plaint amendment application. The core issue was whether the suit was maintainable when filed by delegate attorneys (Plaintiffs 2-5) rather than the sole trustee (Petitioner No. 6) directly. Justice Sandeep V. Marne held that Plaintiff No. 3 possessed valid delegated authority under Powers of Attorney executed by Petitioner No. 6, making the objection to his authority unfounded. The court directed Petitioner No. 6 to file an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC for his direct impleadment as Plaintiff within 2 weeks, with the trial court to decide expeditiously by 30 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case